For the full book, you can visit our Google Books page or read it chapter by chapter.
The Lifecycle of a Standard
Why Understanding the Lifecycle Matters:
Standards are not static. They evolve over time, reflecting new technologies, safety requirements, and industry practices. For engineers and companies, knowing where a standard is in its lifecycle is critical:
– It determines whether you are using the latest version.
– It helps anticipate upcoming revisions that may affect designs, compliance, or procurement.
– It avoids the risk of failing an audit because your team relied on an obsolete document.
The Development Process:
Most standards follow a structured path before publication. Using ISO/IEC as an example, the process includes:
- Proposal Stage (NWIP – New Work Item Proposal): A need for a new standard is identified and reviewed by technical committees.
- Preparatory Stage (Working Draft – WD): Experts draft an initial version, reviewed and refined within technical working groups.
- Committee Stage (Committee Draft – CD): Draft circulated among committee members for comments; may go through several iterations until consensus is reached.
- Enquiry Stage (Draft International Standard – DIS): Draft made available to all ISO/IEC members; national bodies vote and comment.
- Approval Stage (Final Draft International Standard – FDIS): Final comments and approval; almost identical to the final version.
- Publication: The standard is published and made available for purchase; national SDOs may adopt it as IDT, MOD, or NEQ (see Section 3).
After Publication: Maintenance & Revisions:
Once published, a standard enters the maintenance cycle:
- Review Periods: Typically every 5 years, but can be shorter for fast-moving industries (e.g., ICT, aerospace).
- Revisions: Updated to reflect new technology, safety data, or regulatory needs.
- Amendments & Corrigenda: Smaller updates or corrections that supplement the original text.
- Withdrawal: Standards may be retired if replaced by newer documents or if the subject is no longer relevant.
Example:
- ISO 9001 has gone through multiple revisions since 1987 to reflect evolving quality management practices.
- IEC standards in renewable energy are revised frequently to keep up with rapidly advancing technology.
Implications for Engineers & Companies:
- Compliance Risk: Using a withdrawn or outdated standard can cause regulatory non-compliance.
- Design Risk: Products designed to obsolete standards may fail in global markets.
- Procurement Impact: Teams may accidentally purchase multiple outdated versions if they don’t track updates.
- Opportunity: Companies that monitor draft standards can prepare early for upcoming changes, giving them a competitive edge.
Did You Know?
– International standards are formally reviewed every 5 years of publication.
– In regulated industries that use ASME BPVC codes, auditors need proof that the organization uses the latest available version.
– Monitoring standards in draft stages can be said to reduce redesign costs since changes can be predicted early.
Best Practices for Managing the Lifecycle:
– Subscribe to update notifications from SDOs or enterprise platforms.
– Maintain a centralized standards library instead of leaving it to individual engineers.
– Document in your quality manual which versions of standards your company applies.
– Assign responsibility to a “standards manager” or librarian to track lifecycles.
[Visual Placeholder: Matrix – Lifecycle Stage vs. Business Risk/Opportunity]
Finding & Managing Standards
The Challenge of Finding Standards:
For many engineers, the first encounter with standards is not during procurement — it’s during project deadlines. An R&D engineer may suddenly need to confirm testing methods, or a quality manager may need the exact wording of a regulatory requirement.
Common challenges include:
- Fragmentation: Thousands of SDOs, each with separate websites and catalogs.
- Version Confusion: Multiple revisions, addendums, or amendments can make it unclear which version is correct.
- Time Pressure: Engineers often spend hours searching for standards instead of focusing on design.
- Duplicated Purchases: Different departments may unknowingly buy the same standard multiple times.
Without a structured process, companies waste both time and budget while increasing compliance risk.
Typical Search Workflows:
1. Engineer-led Search: Directly browsing SDO websites (ISO, ASTM, IEC). Risk: difficult to cross-compare or find sector-specific sets.
2. Procurement-led Search: Requests filtered through procurement or a document control team. Risk: slower response time, misalignment with urgent engineering needs.
3. Aggregator/Platform Search: Using multi-SDO databases or enterprise tools with intelligent search and filtering. Benefit: centralizes access and reduces duplication.
Hidden Costs of Poor Standards Management
– Wasted Time: Engineers spend hours hunting PDFs instead of innovating.
– Failed Audits: Outdated standards = non-compliance.
– Product Recalls: Using the wrong requirements can lead to multimillion-dollar recalls.
– Legal Risks: Sharing PDFs without proper license exposes the company to penalties.
Best Practices for Managing Standards:
– Centralize access in an enterprise library.
– Assign ownership to a standards coordinator or knowledge manager.
– Train engineers on copyright basics (see Section 7).
– Use platform features (alerts, annotations, audit logs) to embed standards into workflows.
Problems with Siloed Document Management:
When standards are stored in shared drives or on individual desktops:
– Version control is lost — some teams use outdated copies.
– No audit trail — impossible to prove to regulators which version was in use.
– High risk of non-compliance due to unauthorized sharing.
Example: A company relying on emailed PDFs failed a quality audit when two departments used different versions of the same IEC standard.
Siloed PDFs
- No version control
- Difficult to find
- No audit trail
- Compliance risk
- Duplicate purchases
- No usage analytics
Enterprise Platform
- Centralized version control
- Intelligent search
- Audit logs for compliance
- Legal sharing framework
- Eliminate duplicates
- Usage reporting
Features of Modern Enterprise Solutions:
Enterprise standards management platforms (generic, non-branded) solve these issues by offering:
– Intelligent Search: Search across multiple SDOs with filters by year, sector, language.
– Smart Compare: Highlight differences between revisions.
– Alerts & Notifications: Track upcoming changes in subscribed standards.
– Collaboration Tools: Add annotations, bookmarks, and share legally within the license.
– Audit Logs: Demonstrate compliance during regulatory inspections.
Why Enterprise Tools Matter:
– Reduce wasted engineering hours (up to 40% of engineers’ time can be spent just searching for documents).
– Lower costs by avoiding duplicate purchases.
– Reduce compliance risks with proper licensing and audit trails.
– Ensure consistency across the enterprise: all teams reference the same version of the same document.
