UOP 389-09
Trace Metals in Organics by Wet Ashing - ICP-OES
Available Formats:
Availability: Immediate Download
Language: English
License Type: Single User
Updates: Not Included
About This Item
UOP 389-09 is a focused laboratory method for Trace Metals in Organics by Wet Ashing - ICP-OES, designed to help professionals assess metal content in organic samples with analytical clarity. For buyers comparing UOP methods, it supports trace metals evaluation where contamination control, composition review, or product qualification matters. The method is relevant to refinery and petrochemical laboratories that need reliable metals data for sample assessment, QA/QC checks, or technical documentation. As a UOP trace metals method, it aligns with routine analytical workflows where precision and consistency are important.
What does UOP 389-09 measure?
UOP 389-09 measures trace metals present in organic materials using a wet ashing preparation followed by ICP-OES analysis. In practical terms, it is an analytical chemistry method for converting an organic sample into a form suitable for elemental metals determination and then evaluating the resulting signal by instrumental spectrometry. This makes the method useful when a laboratory needs to characterize low-level metal content in organic matrices and compare results across samples, batches, or process conditions. The title indicates a clear focus on trace metals testing rather than broad compositional screening.
Where is UOP 389-09 used?
This method is commonly used in refinery laboratories, fuel and hydrocarbon testing facilities, and petrochemical quality control settings where trace metals data support product review or process monitoring. Analytical chemists, laboratory analysts, QA/QC teams, and technical reviewers may rely on UOP 389-09 when they need a structured approach to metals analysis in organic samples. It is especially relevant in workflows that require consistent laboratory reporting and comparison of sample composition during routine evaluation, investigation, or release testing.
Why is UOP 389-09 important?
UOP 389-09 matters because trace metals can affect product performance, process behavior, and laboratory interpretation, even at low levels. A clear method for wet ashing and ICP-OES analysis helps teams generate more dependable data for quality verification, sample comparison, and technical decision-making. For organizations that depend on refinery QA/QC or analytical documentation, the method supports more consistent review of organic samples and helps reduce uncertainty in metals-related assessments. UOP 389-09 is valuable wherever trace metals results need to be credible, repeatable, and easy to defend in technical reporting.
- Trace metals analysis in organic matrices
- Wet ashing sample preparation
- ICP-OES instrumental measurement
- Refinery and petrochemical lab workflows
- QA/QC and product review support
- Analytical documentation for metals testing
- Publisher: UOP
Need This Standard?
Request a personalized quote today to receive the latest edition in PDF or other available formats.
Need This Standard?
Request a personalized quote today to receive the latest edition in PDF or other available formats.
Summarize with AI
Get quick summaries using your favorite AI engine.
Online Standart Disclaimer
OnlineStandart.com is an authorized reseller of international standards through partnerships with authorized distributors. We do not own the copyrights or trademarks of the standards we sell, including but not limited to those of API, ASHRAE, BSI, SAE, ASTM, IEEE, IEC, ASME, ISO, and others.
All product names, logos, and brands are property of their respective owners. All company, product, and service names used on this website are for identification purposes only. Use of these names, trademarks, and brands does not imply endorsement.
The content provided on this website is for informational purposes only and is intended to promote our reselling services. OnlineStandart.com is not affiliated with or endorsed by any of the standard organizations unless explicitly stated.




