UOP 714-87 describes Metals in Miscellaneous Samples by ICP-AES, making it a practical reference for laboratories that need to evaluate metallic content in non-standard sample types. As a UOP 714-87 test method, it is most relevant when the buyer needs an established analytical approach for elemental metals screening or comparison in refinery, petrochemical, or technical laboratory work. The method title points to instrumental metals analysis by ICP-AES, which supports consistent sample assessment, quality review, and documentation when trace or low-level metals information is needed for operational decisions.

Purpose of UOP 714-87

The purpose of UOP 714-87 is to provide a laboratory method for determining metals in miscellaneous samples using ICP-AES instrumentation. This places the document squarely in analytical chemistry and instrumental testing, where the focus is on obtaining reliable metals data from samples that may not fit a single narrow product category. For laboratory analysts and technical reviewers, the method helps standardize how metals are evaluated, compared, and reported. It is useful when consistent elemental measurement is needed for product review, materials screening, or refinery quality assessment.

Laboratory use of UOP 714-87

UOP 714-87 is commonly suited to laboratory environments that handle petroleum, chemical, or process-related samples requiring metals analysis. It may be used by analytical chemists, laboratory analysts, and refinery QA/QC personnel who need a documented method for ICP-AES evaluation. In practice, it supports sample review, method selection, and internal quality workflows where metals content may affect product handling or technical interpretation. Because the method is tied to miscellaneous samples, it can be useful in labs that manage a range of feedstocks, intermediates, or non-routine material checks.

Practical importance of UOP 714-87

The practical value of UOP 714-87 is its role in supporting clear, repeatable metals testing when teams need dependable analytical documentation. For quality specialists and technical reviewers, a defined UOP method can improve comparison between samples, help maintain consistency across laboratory work, and support decision-making when metals levels are part of the evaluation. In day-to-day use, it contributes to better control of analytical workflows and more confident interpretation of results. That makes it a useful reference for organizations that rely on structured ICP-AES metals analysis.

• Metals analysis by ICP-AES
• Miscellaneous sample evaluation
• Laboratory analytical method
• Refinery QA/QC support
• Technical review and documentation
• Consistent elemental reporting