UOP 779-92 is the method for Chloride in Petroleum Distillates by Microcoulometry, intended for laboratories that need a controlled way to evaluate chloride content in refined distillate materials. It supports analytical review where trace ionic contamination may affect product quality, equipment reliability, or specification assessment. For buyers comparing UOP methods, this standard is relevant when chloride monitoring is part of refinery QA/QC, petroleum sample evaluation, or technical documentation. As a UOP ion analysis method, it is suited to professional laboratory workflows that require consistent, defensible results.

Purpose of UOP 779-92

The purpose of UOP 779-92 is to provide a laboratory method for measuring chloride in petroleum distillates using microcoulometry. That makes it a practical analytical tool for determining whether a distillate sample contains chloride at a level that matters to product evaluation or process review. The method is especially useful in settings where ionic contamination must be checked with care and where method consistency supports reliable data interpretation. In technical terms, it fits the needs of analytical chemists and laboratory reviewers working with petroleum quality assessment.

Laboratory use of UOP 779-92

UOP 779-92 is commonly suited to refinery laboratories, fuel testing groups, and other petroleum analysis settings that examine distillate samples for chloride content. Laboratory analysts and QA/QC personnel may use it when reviewing incoming samples, comparing product lots, or supporting internal quality checks. It also fits technical review work where chemical composition data must be documented in a clear and repeatable way. Because the method focuses on a specific ionic determination, it can support routine sample evaluation within controlled laboratory workflows.

Practical value of UOP 779-92

The practical value of UOP 779-92 lies in its role as a focused analytical reference for chloride testing in petroleum distillates. It helps teams maintain consistency across sample reviews, improve confidence in product comparison, and support quality decisions with method-based data. For laboratories, the standard can strengthen documentation quality and make analytical reporting easier to defend during internal review. For refinery and technical teams, it adds clarity when chloride control is part of process oversight, product qualification, or troubleshooting work.

• Chloride testing for petroleum distillates
• Microcoulometric ion analysis workflow
• Refinery laboratory QA/QC support
• Product quality and sample review
• Analytical documentation and comparison
• Useful for laboratory analysts and technical reviewers