UOP 930-06

UOP 930-06 is the UOP 930-06 method for chloride in LPG and gaseous hydrocarbons by dry colorimetry, giving laboratories a focused way to evaluate chloride contamination in light hydrocarbon streams. For buyers comparing analytical standards, this method is relevant when chloride control matters to product quality, equipment protection, or downstream processing performance. It is designed for use in laboratory analysis where consistent sample review and clear chemical characterization are needed. As a UOP ion analysis method, it supports practical quality checks for refinery, fuel, and petrochemical testing teams.

What does UOP 930-06 measure?

UOP 930-06 is intended to determine chloride in LPG and gaseous hydrocarbons using a dry colorimetric approach. In practical terms, it supports measurement of chloride species in samples where ionic contamination may affect handling, processing, or product acceptance. The method fits analytical chemistry workflows that require a defined laboratory procedure for evaluating chloride presence in light hydrocarbon materials. For labs and technical reviewers, it provides a structured way to assess a specific ionic parameter tied to product cleanliness and chemical control.

Where is UOP 930-06 used?

This method is commonly used in refinery and petrochemical laboratories, as well as in fuel testing and QA/QC environments that evaluate LPG and gaseous hydrocarbon streams. Laboratory analysts may use UOP 930-06 during routine sample review, while refinery chemists and technical teams may rely on it when chloride data is needed for product qualification or troubleshooting. It is also relevant for process engineers and quality specialists who need dependable analytical documentation for light hydrocarbon control and comparison across batches or sources.

Why is UOP 930-06 important?

UOP 930-06 matters because chloride in LPG and gaseous hydrocarbons can be an important quality indicator in routine plant and laboratory work. A consistent analytical method helps teams compare results, support internal specifications, and maintain clearer control over sample evaluation. For organizations that track contaminant-related performance risks, the method can improve confidence in reported data and strengthen technical review. It is especially useful where reliable chloride assessment supports decision-making across laboratory operations and product quality management.

• Chloride analysis for LPG and gaseous hydrocarbons
• Dry colorimetry-based laboratory method
• Supports refinery and petrochemical QA/QC
• Useful for laboratory analysts and technical reviewers
• Helps with product qualification and sample comparison
• UOP ion analysis method for controlled documentation