IEEE P1149.10/D94, Dec 2016

P1149.10/D94, Dec 2016 is a technical standard for chip distribution architecture, written for computing and processing applications where disciplined electronic design matters. It addresses how a chip-level distribution approach is defined and managed, helping engineers work toward consistent performance, controlled implementation, and better alignment across power-related and functional distribution needs. For organizations handling electronics design or procurement, P1149.10/D94, Dec 2016 can be a useful reference point when evaluating architecture choices and compliance expectations.

About P1149.10/D94, Dec 2016

This standard focuses on the distribution architecture used within a chip, which typically means the way internal resources are arranged and delivered across a semiconductor design. In the context of computing and processing, that can influence how reliably the device supports power delivery, signal organization, and overall integration. P1149.10/D94, Dec 2016 is relevant where design teams need a clear technical basis for comparing implementations, documenting requirements, or supporting structured engineering decisions around chip architecture.

Where is P1149.10/D94, Dec 2016 used?

P1149.10/D94, Dec 2016 is most relevant in semiconductor and electronic system design workflows, especially where chip distribution architecture must be defined for computing hardware or power-related processing applications. It may be used by design engineers, verification teams, and procurement groups reviewing architecture requirements for integrated circuits or related components. The standard is also useful in development environments that need consistent technical language when planning distribution behavior, evaluating design approaches, or supporting product documentation.

Importance in practice

In practice, P1149.10/D94, Dec 2016 helps reduce ambiguity in how chip distribution architecture is specified and assessed. That can support better design control, more consistent testing, and clearer communication between engineering and supply-chain teams. For inactive standards, it can still matter in legacy documentation, archived design references, and compatibility reviews. Using a defined technical standard can also help limit risk when comparing implementations or validating whether a design follows an established architectural approach.

• Chip distribution architecture
• Computing and processing applications
• Power-related design context
• Engineering and compliance reference
• Legacy technical documentation