ISO/IEC 29155-2:2013 addresses requirements for benchmarking within the Systems and software engineering - Information technology project performance benchmarking framework. For organizations comparing project outcomes, defining repeatable measures, or preparing documented evaluation methods, it provides a focused reference for structuring benchmarking activities. As part of ISO/IEC 29155, this derived document is relevant when teams need a controlled basis for technical assessment, quality workflows, and operational consistency across projects or suppliers.

Purpose of ISO/IEC 29155-2:2013

The purpose of ISO/IEC 29155-2:2013 is to define requirements that support consistent benchmarking practice for information technology project performance. It is generally used to help organizations establish a defensible framework for measuring and comparing project results, which may include scope, metrics, and evaluation conditions. In engineering and compliance workflows, this kind of requirements document can support technical review, verification activities, and more structured performance assessment when benchmarking is used as part of governance or procurement decisions.

Compliance applications of ISO/IEC 29155-2:2013

ISO/IEC 29155-2:2013 may be applied in project environments where documented benchmarking is needed to support internal audit, supplier evaluation, or regulatory preparation. It is relevant to teams that manage software development, systems integration, and performance measurement processes, especially where comparison across projects or organizations must be traceable and repeatable. The document can also support technical documentation, conformity assessment preparation, and review of benchmarking methods used in procurement or quality assurance workflows.

Benefits of ISO/IEC 29155-2:2013

Using ISO/IEC 29155-2:2013 can improve the reliability of benchmarking outputs by encouraging consistent requirements and clearer evaluation criteria. That helps reduce ambiguity in technical validation, supports better risk management, and strengthens confidence in performance comparisons used during planning or supplier review. For organizations building compliance workflows, it can improve documentation quality, aid verification of results, and provide a more structured basis for engineering decisions where measured performance and operational consistency matter.

• Supports requirements-based benchmarking for IT project performance comparisons
• Helps standardize evaluation conditions for more consistent documented evaluation
• Useful for technical review, supplier assessment, and procurement due diligence
• Can strengthen verification activities and conformity assessment preparation
• Provides a framework aligned with repeatable quality and risk-control workflows