UOP 979-14 is the method used to determine total chloride in alumina supported catalysts by WD-XRF, helping laboratories assess chloride content in a controlled, reproducible way. For refineries, catalyst users, and analytical teams, this kind of measurement supports catalyst evaluation, product qualification, and routine chemistry oversight where chloride levels may affect performance or documentation. As a UOP ion analysis method, it is designed for buyers who need a clear, standards-based approach to laboratory analysis of catalyst samples and related technical review.

Overview of UOP 979-14

UOP 979-14 focuses on the analytical determination of total chloride in alumina supported catalysts using WD-XRF. The official method title points to a measurement-oriented laboratory procedure intended for chemical characterization rather than general inspection. This makes it relevant for teams that need a dependable way to evaluate chloride in catalyst materials, compare sample results, and maintain consistent analytical records. In practical terms, it supports structured sample assessment in environments where catalyst composition and contaminant control are important to quality and process understanding.

Laboratory use of UOP 979-14

This method is commonly suited to refinery and catalyst laboratories, as well as QA/QC and analytical chemistry groups that review catalyst composition data. UOP 979-14 may be used during incoming material checks, periodic catalyst monitoring, or technical review of alumina supported catalyst samples. Laboratory analysts and refinery chemists can use it to support routine testing workflows and help maintain consistency in reported chloride values. It is also useful where documentation quality and method alignment matter for internal review or vendor comparison.

Why UOP 979-14 matters in practice

In day-to-day work, UOP 979-14 helps give teams a consistent basis for chloride measurement in alumina supported catalysts. That can improve result comparability across batches, support quality control decisions, and provide clearer documentation for technical review. For laboratories managing catalyst-related data, the method helps reduce ambiguity in sample evaluation and supports more reliable reporting. Buyers often look for this type of standards method when analytical consistency, traceability, and fit-for-purpose catalyst testing are important to operational decisions.

• Total chloride determination
• Alumina supported catalyst analysis
• WD-XRF laboratory method
• QA/QC and analytical review
• Refinery and catalyst lab workflows
• Technical documentation support